Difference between revisions of "How to make dokuwiki a good mediawiki"
From Linuxintro
imported>ThorstenStaerk |
imported>ThorstenStaerk |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
mediawiki has the advantages | mediawiki has the advantages | ||
* look and feel | * look and feel | ||
| − | * known | + | * known markup language |
* edit buttons are above the section to be edited | * edit buttons are above the section to be edited | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* backup is easy because it is plain files | * backup is easy because it is plain files | ||
| + | So to get to my perfect wiki there are two basic ways: | ||
| + | * use mediawiki and patch/extend it until is can do ACL's. Accept that for a backup, a script is needed. | ||
| + | * use dokuwiki and patches/plugins/skins until it looks like mediawiki and uses mediawiki's markup | ||
I want the ACL features of dokuwiki and the look-and-feel of mediawiki. | I want the ACL features of dokuwiki and the look-and-feel of mediawiki. | ||
Revision as of 10:40, 10 July 2011
Comparing dokuwiki and mediawiki I come to the result that
mediawiki has the advantages
- look and feel
- known markup language
- edit buttons are above the section to be edited
while dokuwiki has the advantages
- ACL's allow me to keep pages invisible
- backup is easy because it is plain files
So to get to my perfect wiki there are two basic ways:
- use mediawiki and patch/extend it until is can do ACL's. Accept that for a backup, a script is needed.
- use dokuwiki and patches/plugins/skins until it looks like mediawiki and uses mediawiki's markup
I want the ACL features of dokuwiki and the look-and-feel of mediawiki.
html_secedit replaces ## by some text
See also
This article is a stub and needs improvement. You can help here :)
